On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 05:01:33PM +1100, Tim Cross wrote:
<tomas@tuxteam.de> writes:
As far as I am concerned, I don't think the feature is important
enough to complexify Org, but (a) I see that there are people who
really want it (and offer myself as sparring partner to bounce ideas
off) and (b) Org is chock full of features I'd rather not have,
but others need badly. Software is like that :-)
I agree. While I can understand it is a feature some users may want, it
certainly isn't one I'm interested in and I continue to be very
concerned about the feature growth and increase in complexity I see with
org. I fear we are losing one of the best features of org - simplicity
and easy customization for individual needs.
Agreed, so far.
I find the straight-forward
nature of a tree structure much simpler to work with than one which will
be less tree like and more directed graph like.
Strongly disagree.
Both are trees (that's why I prefer to talk about "document model".
It's only so that in Org, only the first child of a section node
can be text, the following must be subsections. In "XML" you just
can intermix subsections and text (actually: any kind of subnodes).