[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[emms-help] Re: Emms, emms or EMMS?
From: |
Lucas Bonnet |
Subject: |
[emms-help] Re: Emms, emms or EMMS? |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Jul 2005 20:15:36 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jorgen Schaefer <address@hidden> writes:
> ** EMMS, Emms, emms, or what?
> -----------------------------
> In various contexts, this program is called EMMS, Emms or emms. Those
> are all correct, and which you use is a matter of personal preference.
> EMMS highlights the acronym character of the name. Emms is akin to
> Emacs and Gnus, ignoring that Emms is pronounce ee-em-em-es, and not a
> single name. emms is highlighting that emms is a case-sensitive file
> name and Emacs Lisp command.
>
Perfect :)
[emms-help] Re: Emms, emms or EMMS?, Lucas Bonnet, 2005/07/04
[emms-help] Re: Emms, emms or EMMS?, Daniel Brockman, 2005/07/05