[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fenfire-dev] Jodi article, deadlines
From: |
Alatalo Toni |
Subject: |
Re: [Fenfire-dev] Jodi article, deadlines |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:38:21 +0300 (EEST) |
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> We *really* need to get better at deadlines. There was so much hurry
> that I can now see significant problems with the article: e.g. the
> FenPDF section didn't mention a lot of important points.
i did not have a chance to participate hardly at all,
although would have wanted a lot. (had an overlapping deadline)
(well the root cause was of course earlier, in August when i was focusing
on programming for another project)
> How about a policy: if we don't have a *full* draft two weeks
> before a deadline, for circulating to people we know in the field
> for the comments, we just forget about the deadline?
sounds reasonable. my prof. has said it should be a month, but two weeks
might suffice (if you don't need comments from very busy/slow response
people).
> Tuomas
~Toni
P.S. cc'ing to Kyperjokki where the other deadline was,
we should apply the same principle there.