[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp
From: |
Benja Fallenstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Sep 2003 13:56:52 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030908 Debian/1.4-4 |
Tuomas Lukka wrote:
ARGH. Didn't I make myself clear? I want these to be **replaced** by the
TripleIter method(s). The PEG proposes all current methods in
Graph/ConstGraph dealing with getting/adding/removing triples to be
replaced by those in the PEG.
Well, this certainly wasn't explicitly mentioned in the PEG.
Ok-- miscommunication. I said "shall have the following API for getting
triples" and all was clear to me ;) ;)
I'd prefer to have both, and to deprecate the _Iter methods - for now.
There's a lot of code that uses _iter right now...
Yes, and that code would get more readable to me if it was changed to
TriplesIter :-) so I would really like to have that :-)
I'll volunteer changing the existing code. Ok?
I still prefer subj, pred, obj...
Hm, ok. subj, pred, obj it is. (Because I can pronounce these in German
or Finnish ;-) )
[more than one triple in ``getObject()`` etc.]
Jena returns just an arbitrary one of the matching triples in a similar
situation; I'm leaning towards that.
I'd *really* hate that one -- I'd prefer swamp to have totally clear
semantics, with the only arbitrary thing being the order in which a set
is iterated through.
Hmm. Any ideas, then? Maybe remove ``getObject()`` etc.?
- Benja
- [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/21
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Matti Katila, 2003/09/21
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp,
Benja Fallenstein <=
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/09/22
- Re: [Fenfire-dev] PEG swamp_easier--benja: An easier API for Swamp, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/09/22