|
From: | Benja Fallenstein |
Subject: | Re: [Fenfire-dev] Libvob: Modifications in base classes. |
Date: | Sun, 07 Mar 2004 20:31:07 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040122 Debian/1.6-1 |
Matti Katila wrote:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Matti Katila wrote:later, if we like this option we can enclapsuate those to vs itself so then it will look like:vs.animate() or vs.switch()Actually vs.switchVS() because switch is a statement in java language.
Actually, I'd prefer update() updateNoAnimation() because- these tell WindowAnimation to regenerate the vobscene, which should be said in the method names IMO
- it should be clear from the names that they do similar things- animating is the normal case, so it seems reasonable to say just update() for that and have updateNoAnimation() have the longer name.
- Benja
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |