[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [fluid-dev] Re: What is the best way start fluidsynth with zero/low
From: |
jimmy |
Subject: |
Re: [fluid-dev] Re: What is the best way start fluidsynth with zero/low latency? (Louis B.) |
Date: |
Sat, 23 May 2009 15:57:33 -0700 (PDT) |
You are right Pedro, my bad. I remembered that wrong. I got that mixed up
with jackd and qjackctl combo.
Jimmy
--- On Sat, 5/23/09, Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Pedro Lopez-Cabanillas <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [fluid-dev] Re: What is the best way start fluidsynth with
> zero/low latency? (Louis B.)
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: "jimmy" <address@hidden>
> Date: Saturday, May 23, 2009, 11:50 AM
> On Saturday, May 23, 2009, jimmy
> wrote:
> > I still suggest they use qsynth to start
> fluidsynth. Do mention that if
> > they have a problem with qsynth, they can try to
> start fluidsynth
> > manually. Once they use qsynth to start
> fluidsynth, they can use:
> >
> > ps -ef | grep fluidsynth
> >
> > to get the commandline that qsynth uses to start
> fluidsynth. With that
> > info, they can start fluidsynth themselves from the
> commandline, or from a
> > script. They can learn more about fluidsynth
> commandline options after
> > that if they want.
>
> That suggestion makes no sense at all. QSynth doesn't start
> the fluidsynth
> commandline executable in any way. It is a standalone GUI
> program using
> libfluidsynth, in a similar way that fluidsynth is a CLI
> program using the
> same library for the same purposes.
>
> There are no shortcuts, except understanding the involved
> concepts. You may
> ask here, in this mailing list, to the people that is
> delivering these
> programs to you if you have any doubts or need
> clarifications.
>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [fluid-dev] Re: What is the best way start fluidsynth with zero/low latency? (Louis B.),
jimmy <=