[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RFA: Improving StencilEngine Comments
From: |
Jeffrey Oldham |
Subject: |
RFA: Improving StencilEngine Comments |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Jun 2001 17:21:03 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
OK to commit this patch? Does it meet Pooma comment guidelines?
When working on implementing restriction operators for arrays, I read
through src/Engine/Stencil.h. The most confusing aspect was that
"domain" is used for both stencil input and stencil output. Also, the
invariants and data members for the StencilEngine were not documented.
I wrote comments that, I hope, clarify these aspects.
2001-06-29 Jeffrey D. Oldham <address@hidden>
* Stencil.h: Fix typographical errors.
Add stencil concept comments.
(insetDomain): Modify initial comments.
(Engine<D,T,StencilEngine>): Fix typographical error.
(Engine::Engine): Modify initial comments.
(Engine::read): Likewise.
(Engine::domain): Likewise.
(Engine::first): Likewise.
(Engine::viewDomain): Likewise. Add other comments.
(Engine::intersectDomain): Add initial comment.
(View1): Modify initial comments.
(View2): Likewise.
(Stencil): Fix typographical error in initial comments.
(DataObjectRequest): Likewise.
Tested on sequential Linux using gcc 3.0 by compiling Pooma library
Approved by ???you???
Thanks,
Jeffrey D. Oldham
address@hidden
Stencil.h.patch
Description: Text document
- RFA: Improving StencilEngine Comments,
Jeffrey Oldham <=