[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?
From: |
James Crotinger |
Subject: |
RE: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Sep 2001 09:56:50 -0600 |
We do use compilers that don't put C functions in std::. I think both SGI CC and VC++ have .h-less C headers, but don't put the C functions in std::. The .h-less C header files are standard conforming and at least prior to the 2.4 project our rule was to use these since they were more portable.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeffrey Oldham [mailto:address@hidden]
> Sent: Friday, September 28, 2001 8:23 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?
>
>
>
> For Pooma, what compilers are we supporting? In particular,
> are we supporting any compilers did not recognize the standard
> '.h'-less header filenames?
>
> Right now, the code uses both deprecated and standard header
> filenames.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeffrey D. Oldham
> address@hidden
>
- RE: [pooma-dev] Supported Compilers?,
James Crotinger <=