RE: [pooma-dev] POOMA Namespace Pollution

[Richard Guenther]

On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, James Crotinger wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I thought that the various global (non-Pooma::) functions all had Pooma::
> objects as arguments, which should usually be enough to avoid collisions
> with other people's stuff. What are the problem functions?

The only problem I experienced is conflicting functions (f.i. positions())
with variables of the same name in my program. But the original request
was about classes anyway.

Richard.