Re: [pooma-dev] Re: [PATCH] Back to using Cheetah::CHEETAH for serialization

[Jeffrey D. Oldham]

Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Jan 2004, Jeffrey D. Oldham wrote:
>
>
> > Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > This patch is a partial reversion of a previous patch that made us use
> > > Cheetah::DELEGATE serialization for RemoteProxy.  It also brings us a
> > > Cheetah::CHEETAH serialization for std::string, which was previously
> > > missing.  One step more for the MPI merge.
> > >
> > > Tested together with all other MPI changes with serial, Cheetah and MPI.
> > >
> > > Ok?
> >
> > Yes.  Do we need more regression tests for this work to better ensure
> > correctness?
>
>
> Maybe, at least we get all non-POD types that are not explicitly
> specialized wrong during serialization.  And I can tell you, such errors
> are _very_ hard to find (happened for me for std::string and RemoteProxy).
>
> Richard.

Yes, we're running the regression tests in serial, not parallel, only so 
testing may be hard.

--
Jeffrey D. Oldham
address@hidden