freepooma-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [pooma-dev] Re: [PATCH] Kill Unwrap<>


From: Richard Guenther
Subject: Re: [pooma-dev] Re: [PATCH] Kill Unwrap<>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 23:07:55 +0100 (CET)

On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Jeffrey D. Oldham wrote:

> Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This patch kills previously introduced Unwrap<> and instead provides a
> > fallback in OpMask<>.  This way we don't forget places to update (as I did
> > with PartialReduction in case of OpenMP).
> >
> > Tested on serial ia64 linux with no regressions.
> >
> > Ok?
>
> Thanks for fixing this.  I agree it's a good idea to have the default
> values do the right thing.  Are there any other operators that need
> modification as well?  Is it OK to have an additional if in the Where
> operator?  Will this impact performance?

It's really only the WhereProxy and its OpMask wrapping operator that is
this special. Performance should be unaffected.

Richard.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]