[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [pooma-dev] Re: [PATCH] Kill Unwrap<>
From: |
Richard Guenther |
Subject: |
Re: [pooma-dev] Re: [PATCH] Kill Unwrap<> |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Jan 2004 23:07:55 +0100 (CET) |
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Jeffrey D. Oldham wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > This patch kills previously introduced Unwrap<> and instead provides a
> > fallback in OpMask<>. This way we don't forget places to update (as I did
> > with PartialReduction in case of OpenMP).
> >
> > Tested on serial ia64 linux with no regressions.
> >
> > Ok?
>
> Thanks for fixing this. I agree it's a good idea to have the default
> values do the right thing. Are there any other operators that need
> modification as well? Is it OK to have an additional if in the Where
> operator? Will this impact performance?
It's really only the WhereProxy and its OpMask wrapping operator that is
this special. Performance should be unaffected.
Richard.