|
From: | Jeffrey D. Oldham |
Subject: | Re: [pooma-dev] Re: [PATCH] Shorten filenames during build/link |
Date: | Tue, 01 Jun 2004 12:51:13 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031107 Debian/1.5-3 |
Richard Guenther wrote:
Do as you wish, but I would recommend committing it. I think it's unlikely that an operating system does not have . but does have a hierarchy, but I thought it was worth asking.Jeffrey D. Oldham wrote:Richard Guenther wrote:This patch shortens filenames by omitting full path to avoid overly long command lines. Compiled and tested building some examples, benchmarks and tests.Ok? Richard.Yes, this is fine as long as it does not break compiling on some operating system. For example, does Windows support '.'?I don't know. I don't care either, and I never did (f.i. I don't know of the impact of the configure changes). Do we care about Windows? Can Windows use the make infrastructure at all? Or does it need the CW project stuff?I'll hold on this until someone can either report that Windows compiling is broken anyway, or can confirm the change is safe.Richard.
I do not know if POOMA compiles under Windows. -- Jeffrey D. Oldham address@hidden
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |