Re: [pooma-dev] Cheetah / PETE license

[John H . Hall]

Nope. Sorry. I haven't been in Los Alamos for a while. I am now in 
Alexandria VA until August. So getting things done back at the lab is 
very difficult. I will try to look into it again, but, I need a 
champion who is physically located there. You can't remove the 
dependency on PETE easily, so we might as well just go ahead and get 
the licenses straightened out.

You will have to ask others how important Cheetah is. I haven't had to 
go down to that level of detail yet. Remember, those of us using 
supercomputers have to have the ability to work on a single box and 
across multiple boxes, which might require different protocols (e.g. 
threads within a box, MPI across boxes?). I seem to remember that being 
what Cheetah was all about.
John Hall

On May 31, 2004, at 11:01 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:

> Hi!
>
> Is there any progress regarding the missing Cheetah / PETE licenses? 
> Would there be objections against removing Cheetah support from POOMA?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.