On 29 Aug 2023 22:09 +0300, Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org>, wrote:
here is the results with chris’ suggestion. (thanks chris)
Much better, thanks!
still a bit noise on only load and load_advances. are results
acceptable?
As far as I can see, the biggest differences occur if the 'Baseline'
and 'Benchmark' columns contain very small values. I still think that
for such cases the number of iterations of the affected tests should
be increased to get more precise values. Please try that.
Something else: I think that the 'TOTAL' line doesn't make sense right
now. Please separate this line slightly from the rest of the table
and print the *cumulated timing* (in 's', not 'µs') of all tests,
something like
Total duration for all tests: 25.3s
and
Total duration of tests for 'Roboto_subset.ttf: 3.4s
Werner