[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Current state of the ansi test suite
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Current state of the ansi test suite |
Date: |
02 Oct 2002 20:16:10 -0400 |
Greetings!
OK, I'll defer to your judgement here. What about supplying functions
that aren't in the spec -- i.e. implementation-dependent functions?
Is this generically OK as long as I don't tread on the canonical
namespace? Which leads me to another question -- there is no truly
'static' function declaration in lisp, is there? I.e. if one does not
export a function from a package, one can still always access it with
package::function, right? Is there any way to make an internal
function visible only to a certain defined group of other functions,
no matter how it is called, i.e. like a static declaration in a C
'file'?
Take care,
"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:
> Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Greetings! Great, OK, so from my reading, I can add a keyword :rev to
> > member, set-difference, and nset-difference. Any disagree?
>
> I'm afraid I have to disagree. On closer reading, the standard
> says that safe calls must signal a program-error if you do that.
>
> (See section 3.5.1.4.)
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah