[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] Two new tests for (SETF (VALUES ...) ...)
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] Two new tests for (SETF (VALUES ...) ...) |
Date: |
22 Oct 2002 10:59:17 -0400 |
Greetings, and thanks as always for your work on these tests!
Should I take a look at fixing this, or did you want to try to get the
define-setf-method working here? By the way, I had tried to use
defsetf to define a values method using the examples at the top of
lsp/setf.lsp. I didn't spend too much time, but had difficulty in
getting the 'store-form' list to handle multiple values. This is
still probably the best way to go, but if you'd rather not right now,
I think I can get the evaluation order in what we have working.
Just another note -- the setf implementation goes through a C wrapper
processing certain cases before the lisp is ever called. I can't
determine whether this was by design or accretion, but in any case, setf
is not uniformly handled at present.
Take care,
"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:
> I added two new tests of (setf (values ...) ...). They expose two
> bugs in the current implementation: the macro expansion uses setq
> where it should use setf, and the evaluation order of subforms
> is incorrect.
>
> See SETF-VALUES.[45] in ansi-tests/places.lsp.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
Re: [Gcl-devel] Two new tests for (SETF (VALUES ...) ...), Camm Maguire, 2002/10/23