[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
[Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O |
Date: |
09 Mar 2004 15:51:45 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings. Basically yes, but for clarity:
=============================================================================
g.c
=============================================================================
typedef struct {
const char *n;
unsigned long ad;
} Plt;
#include <math.h>
static Plt mplt[]={{"cos",(unsigned long)(void *)cos}};
int
main() {
return 0;
}
=============================================================================
gcc -g -Wall -c g.c -o g.o
g.c:7: warning: `mplt' defined but not used
=============================================================================(
Thanks for your help with this!
Take care,
"Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <address@hidden> writes:
> Camm Maguire ?????:
> > Greetings!
> > "Vadim V. Zhytnikov" <address@hidden> writes:
> >
> >>Camm Maguire:
> >>
> >>>Greetings!
> >>
> >><snip>
> >>
> >>>The last possibility is that we put in some configure magic to skip
> >>>the plt stuff on windows and macosx. I don't like this much, as I
> >>>fear that eventually the binutils change will catch up there too.
> >>
> >>I was about to propose this as a temporary solution for 2.6.2 release.
> >>The problem sounds too serious to make serious improvements in a hurry.
> >>On the other hand I'd to see 2.6.2 released really soon.
> >>Thank to Camm we now have a fix for Linux - at present the only
> >>system where problem with new binutils shows up.
> >>Further investigation and improvement could be moved to 2.7.X
> >>and if more robust scheme will be found it the we can release
> >>2.6.3.
> > This is possible, but before deciding, could we briefly pursue 2
> > questions:
> > 1) Do we know what happens on mingw with binutils .8? Can we find
> > out
> > if not?
> > 2) Could you or Mike try to compile that simple little test with
> > 'cos'
> > only, let me know if it works, and why not if not?
>
> Do you mean plttest.c with just one cos(d) call?
>
>
>
> > I don't want to spend a lot of time either, but these should be quick
> > I'm hoping. I'd like to have the greatest possible chance of never
> > having to look back at the 2.6 series.
> > Take care,
>
> --
> Vadim V. Zhytnikov
>
> <address@hidden>
> <address@hidden>
>
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- [Gcl-devel] PLT code and Mach-O, Aurelien Chanudet, 2004/03/10
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/10
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/03/10
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/10
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/03/10
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/03/10
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O,
Camm Maguire <=
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/03/11
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/11
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/03/11
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/11
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Vadim V. Zhytnikov, 2004/03/13
- [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/12
- RE: [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Mike Thomas, 2004/03/14
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/15
- Re: [Gcl-devel] Re: PLT code and Mach-O, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/16
Re: [Gcl-devel] PLT code and Mach-O, Camm Maguire, 2004/03/19