[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gforth] [IF] .. [ELSE] .. [THEN] implementation question
From: |
Josh Grams |
Subject: |
Re: [gforth] [IF] .. [ELSE] .. [THEN] implementation question |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:27:45 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
> Anton Ertl wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 05:11:10PM -0500, Josh Grams wrote:
>>> In kernel/toolsext.fs, is there a reason why the definition of [ELSE] in
>>> [struct]-voc (at line 40) is not immediate? All the others are...
>>
>> There appears to be, because if I make it immediate, too, Gforth
>> breaks. It's unclear to me what the reason is, though. Maybe Bernd
>> can shed some light on it.
>
> As far as I can see, it is immediate, the immediate is just a line
> below.
Argh! :) So it is. I guess the formatting threw me off: I didn't
notice that there was an `immediate` on the line above [IFDEF].
Sorry about that...
--Josh