[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gforth] 'make install' of 0.7.1 and 0.7.2 failed on Debian 7.1 on x
From: |
Bernd Paysan |
Subject: |
Re: [gforth] 'make install' of 0.7.1 and 0.7.2 failed on Debian 7.1 on x86 |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:38:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/4.10.5 (Linux/3.7.10-1.16-desktop; KDE/4.10.5; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Montag, 19. August 2013, 17:47:48 schrieb Marcos Cruz:
> Now I see, the log reads "(ignored)" in those cases. The last lines of
> the log are:
>
> --------------------------------
> /usr/bin/install -c -m 644 kernl32l.fi /usr/local/share/gforth/0.7.2
> /usr/bin/install: cannot stat `gforth.elc': No such file or directory
> make: *** [install] Error 1
> --------------------------------
You probably don't have an emacs installed, so compiling gforth.elc fails.
> > If you like to generate a log in English, set LANG=en_US.UTF-8
>
> Please find both logs attached, created with English LANG and:
>
> sudo make install &> make_install_gforth07X.log.
Ok, the problem with 0.7.1 is known and was (quickly) fixed in 0.7.2.
> Debian's Gforth was removed first.
>
> The installation copies the binaries to </usr/local/bin/> and creates
> their simbolic links, but the execution fails because the image can not
> be found:
>
> --------------------------------
> $ cd && gforth
> gforth: cannot open image file gforth.fi in path
> .:/usr/local/lib/gforth/site-forth:/usr/local/share/gforth/site-forth:/usr/l
> ocal/lib/gforth/0.7.2:/usr/local/share/gforth/0.7.2 for reading
> --------------------------------
Maybe we should move gforth.elc last, because it might have not been built due
to a missing emacs, and in that case, it is not needed ;-).
--
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://bernd-paysan.de/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.