Re: cset seems to override the next byte

[Bernd Paysan]

Am Montag, 28. Dezember 2020, 14:08:06 CET schrieb Anton Ertl:
> We use CSET internally, so we may add a word with its current
> functionality, but a different name.  The convention would be to call
> it SET, but I don't want to waste this name on a little-used word;
> maybe MASK-SET or OR! would be appropriate names.

I'm for this set:

: or!   ( x addr -- )    >r r@ @ or   r> ! ;
: xor!  ( x addr -- )    >r r@ @ xor  r> ! ;
: and!  ( x addr -- )    >r r@ @ and  r> ! ;

: xorc! ( x c-addr -- )  >r r@ c@ xor r> c! ;
: andc! ( x c-addr -- )  >r r@ c@ and r> c! ;
: orc!  ( x c-addr -- )  >r r@ c@ or  r> c! ;

-- 
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
net2o id: kQusJzA;7*?t=uy@X}1GWr!+0qqp_Cn176t4(dQ*
https://net2o.de/

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.