Re: [glob2-devel] USL return Patch & Unit Testing Framework

[Martin Voelkle]

On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 7:44 PM, Numbeast .<address@hidden> wrote:
> While looking through the usl code I noticed Usl has no notion of operator
> precedence. This means that while executing mathematical expressions such as
> 1 + 2 * 3 usl returns values which seem wrong at first glance. Is this an
> intentional omision intented to keep the intrepreter clean and simple or is
> operator precedence a planned feature?

It's an intentional omission. It could be implemented but I'm not
convinced it's worth it.

Martin