Re: [Gluster-devel] Architecture advice

[Joe Landman]

Dan Parsons wrote:
> Now that I'm upgrading to gluster 1.4/2.0, I'm going to take the time
> and rearchitect things.
>
> Hardware: Gluster servers: 4 blades connected via 4gbit fc to fast,
> dedicated storage. Each server has two bonded Gig-E links to the rest
> of my network, for 8gbit/s theoretical throughput.

Just make sure the channel bonded gigabits are a) not broadcom based, b) 
not using anything other than mode 0 (long story, but me offline if you 
want to hear some horror stories of hard to fix crashes).  If you have 
access to 10 GbE/IB, these would be superior solutions (entire system 
... storage and clients).

> Gluster clients: 33 blades each with one, gig-e connection. They use
> local storage for OS and gluster for input/output files.
>
> Specific questions: (1) There are many times, in our workflow, when
> more than a few nodes will want the same file at the same time. This
> made me want to use the stripe xlator. In this way, when a client
> node saturates its gig-e link reading the file, each gluster server
> is using only 250mbit/s, leaving room for more clients. If I wasn't
> using stripe, this hypothetical file would be on just one server
> node, and it would get slammed if more than two client nodes talked
> to it. Is there a better way of doing this? Did I make the correct
> decision in using stripe xlator for this purpose? Can I achieve the
> same thing using just afr?

Without spending money to fix the storage architecture, you really will 
need to look at afr, as stripe may help on single requests more than 
multiple (guessing).  You should be able to benchmark/test this, but I 
would imagine that AFR would help you with multiple simultaneous 
read/only access to specific files.  Read/write will be more complex.

If you can spend money to fix the storage architecture, 10GbE or IB 
everywhere (storage nodes, client nodes, ...).  You won't regret it.

> (2) I would like to architect the system such that if one node goes
> down, the others can keep serving the data, even if overall
> throughput is less. This means that all data would need to be
> accessible from all clients. Is this something I would use afr xlator
> for? If so, do I even need stripe anymore, to handle my need to have

Server side AFR.  Stripe may not help the reliability here.

> multiple servers capable of sending different chunks of the same
> file? And how does the HA xlator play into this?
>
> We have a mix of (small quantity of gigantic files) and (extremely
> gigantic quantity of small files), so I'm sure there will need to be
> some parameter tuning.
>
> Thanks in advance. If this question would be better addressed under
> some sort of support agreement, please let me know.
>
> Dan Parsons
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Gluster-devel mailing
> list address@hidden 
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gluster-devel


--
Joseph Landman, Ph.D
Founder and CEO
Scalable Informatics LLC,
email: address@hidden
web  : http://www.scalableinformatics.com
       http://jackrabbit.scalableinformatics.com
phone: +1 734 786 8423 x121
fax  : +1 866 888 3112
cell : +1 734 612 4615