Re: [Gluster-devel] Fedora (f18), revised packaging for glusterfs

[Kaleb Keithley]

From: "Joe Julian" <address@hidden>
>
> If GlusterFS support is being pushed to the OpenStack project, then I think 
> it shouldn't be in the gluster rpms. 

Fair enough. I don't disagree with you, but---

When will the changes appear in the OpenStack (swift) sources? I don't think we 
know, do we?

And once they're in, will we need to make any associated changes to glusterfs?

In the mean time I'm not personally opposed to packaging a set of extra RPMs. 
Gluster.org has already done that, but not in a convenient way.

Once swift is usable out-of-the-box, I'd drop the extra RPMs in a heartbeat 
because — obviously — it would be silly to keep them at that point.

Thoughts?

--

Kaleb