[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies
From: |
Theodore Ts'o |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Mar 2013 10:07:44 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:48:14AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > We don't have reached a conclusion so far, do we? What about the
> > ioctl approach, but a bit differently? Would it work to specify the
> > allowed upper bits for ext4 (for example 16 additional bit) and the
> > remaining part for gluster? One of the mails had the calculation
> > formula:
>
> I did throw together an ioctl patch last week, but I think Anand has a new
> approach he's trying out which won't require ext4 code changes. I'll let
> him reply when he has a moment. :)
Any update about whether Gluster can address this without needing the
ioctl patch? Or should we push the ioctl patch into ext4 for the next
merge window?
Thanks,
- Ted
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies, Bernd Schubert, 2013/03/26
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies, Eric Sandeen, 2013/03/26
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies,
Theodore Ts'o <=
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies, Jeff Darcy, 2013/03/28
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies, Eric Sandeen, 2013/03/28
- Message not available
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies, Anand Avati, 2013/03/28
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies, J. Bruce Fields, 2013/03/28
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies, Anand Avati, 2013/03/28
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies, Jeff Darcy, 2013/03/28
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies, Anand Avati, 2013/03/28
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies, Anand Avati, 2013/03/28
- Re: [Gluster-devel] regressions due to 64-bit ext4 directory cookies, Jeff Darcy, 2013/03/28