Re: [Gluster-devel] 1st results: gcov/lcov code coverage of glusterfs

[Vijay Bellur]

On 05/17/2013 02:01 AM, John Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Im not quite sure what im seeing here, but ...
>
> the prove test './tests/basic/posixonly.t' should test, well, posix ;).
>
> and yet the gcov report says its not being hit:
> http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/lcov/glusterfs/usr/local/glusterfs/lib/glusterfs/3git/xlator/storage/posix.c.gcov.html
>
> Does anyone who has a deeper understanding of both the codebase and
> the test know if that test should indeed hit that file ? If so, the
> report is wrong. And if not, the test may need to be changed.

The test should indeed hit posix.c. Wouldn't this be indicative of what 
lines were covered by this test:

http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/lcov/glusterfs/xlators/storage/posix/src/posix.c.gcov.html

Thanks,
Vijay