|
From: | Vijay Bellur |
Subject: | Re: [Gluster-devel] Fwd: New Defects reported by Coverity Scan for GlusterFS |
Date: | Fri, 03 Jan 2014 12:17:53 +0530 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 |
On 01/02/2014 09:26 PM, Brian Foster wrote:
On 01/02/2014 06:32 AM, Vijay Bellur wrote:On 12/31/2013 04:53 PM, Lalatendu Mohanty wrote:Here is the last Coverity scan report in 2013 for master branch of GlusterFS. I have tried to cover the whole code base for this Coverity scan by enabling possible translators. Happy new year Gluster Ants :)Thanks, Lala and Happy new year to you too! :)Please find the latest report on new defect(s) introduced to GlusterFS found with Coverity Scan. Defect(s) Reported-by: Coverity Scan Showing 7 of 291 defect(s)Avati, Brian: All these errors seem to be coming from the imported qemu code. Do we mark them as false positives as we probably do not intend fixing them?That's what I would vote for, or to just skip scanning the imported qemu code if that is an option..?
Makes sense. There seems to be an option for skipping certain directories and I have added a filter to avoid getting issues reported from contrib/*.
-Vijay
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |