Re: [gNewSense-art] Re-Licensing Artwork.

[Sam Geeraerts]

>
>>> Do I have to list the images used in the Documentation in the Artwork
>>> List at the RelicensingArtwork[1] wiki. Hitherto, under the assumption
>>> that the images used in the Documentation are not "Artistic", I have
>>> ignored to list them in the wiki. I'll have track (and thus list)
>>> these images in the Documentation, if it is required.
>
> Sam Geeraerts wrote:
>
>> If I remember correctly, I contacted Brett at the time because I was
>> unsure about how we put the "real" artwork on the wiki, but also because
>> I noticed some non-artwork wiki pages with images that are (or could be
>> mistaken for) artwork. Any references I had about that got lost when my
>> disk crashed.
>
> So, should I list the images that are part of Documentation separately
> from those that purely qualify as "artwork" or just leave them alone and
> not list them in the RelicensingArtwork wiki ?

You should hunt down anything on the website that's ambiguous, i.e.
anything that's not clearly documentation or artwork and work that's a
combination of incompatibly licensed works. Where you list it is up to
you.