[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glib dependency
From: |
Pawel Kot |
Subject: |
Re: glib dependency |
Date: |
Sun, 18 May 2008 11:59:18 +0200 |
Hi,
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 12:50 AM, Helge Deller <address@hidden> wrote:
> I've not developed much for gnokii in that last months, so I'm not sure if
> it's valid that I comment here.
Every comment is valid, useful and appreciated.
> Nevertheless I think it's a bad idea to add a dependency on any "external"
> library.
There are already several but they are optional.
> gnokii can be used very good in embedded devices and glib would just add
> more (mostly unneeded) resources.
>
> IMHO, better add functions which provide the functionality you need...
I think this is the huge problem with Open Source development.
Everybody is afraid of the bloat given by dependency on the external
library and reimplements the same functionality :(
I don't think we will avoid dependency on openobex, libsyncml, libical
or libvcard in the near future.
However I gave up idea with a hashtable for the moment: we don't have
that large lists that it would make any real difference. On the other
hand C programming would be much easier when standard library would
offer operations on basic data structures...
take care,
pkot
--
Pawel Kot