[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] minor patch-log file format questions
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] minor patch-log file format questions |
Date: |
21 Aug 2003 08:28:08 +0900 |
(1) Why are empty headers included? Besides the obvious space wastage,
it makes logs harder to read. I don't think it makes automatic
parsing any easier.
(2) If you use commit's -L option, why is the single description line
repeated twice, once in the Summary: line, and once in the log body?
I think it should just be in the summary line (with the log body
either being empty, or containing the merge record stuff).
(3) Why are there two date headers? I think the ISO-ish format date is
nicer, but why not just put that in the Date: header, and drop the
Standard-date: header?k
Thanks,
-Miles
--
I'm beginning to think that life is just one long Yoko Ono album; no rhyme
or reason, just a lot of incoherent shrieks and then it's over. --Ian Wolff
- [Gnu-arch-users] minor patch-log file format questions,
Miles Bader <=