[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info
From: |
Zack Brown |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 11:55:15 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 02:04:17PM -0400, Miles Bader wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 10:01:59AM -0700, Zack Brown wrote:
> > Why not use DocBook instead? It's far more flexible.
>
> (1) It's butt-ugly, like all sgml derivatives.
that's not true! XML is great! (XSLT, on the other hand, is butt ugly,
but gets the job done)
> Its extremely verbose
> tagging syntax puts the emphasis on the tags and not on the text.
> Indeed, it seems to be _worse_ than `traditional' sgml; at least the
> docbook source I've seen wraps _every_ paragraph in <para>...</para> --
> nice for the document processing program, not so nice for the document
> author.
Not so bad either, you just have macros to insert the tags. It's just a
set of conventions. You get used to it. And then you have a tremendous
amount of power over your text.
>
> (2) It's heavily promoted by Eric Raymond; that alone should give you pause...
Well, I would consider it on its merits regardless.
I agree DocBook is a bit verbose, but XML seems like the best tagging
system around - it's just so flexible. We could conceivably come up with
our own set of tags, which would be simple and clear.
Be well,
Zack
>
> -Miles
> --
> We have met the enemy, and he is us. -- Pogo
--
Zack Brown
documentation as info (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla1.1 plans), Christian Lynbech, 2003/09/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Florian Weimer, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Denys Duchier, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Zack Brown, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Miles Bader, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info,
Zack Brown <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Florian Weimer, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Andrew Suffield, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Tom Lord, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Tom Lord, 2003/09/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: documentation as info, Tupshin Harper, 2003/09/16