[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sparse libs and merge fest fun
From: |
Pau Aliagas |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sparse libs and merge fest fun |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:11:28 +0100 (CET) |
On Fri, 14 Nov 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 18:41, Pau Aliagas wrote:
>
> > I think that the default behaviour should be to build sparse revisions.
> > People are usually less interested in older revisions IMHO.
> >
> > I can imagine someone having all the tla libraries being added recursively
> > or, by the same reasoning, the kernel revisions, looking at the I/O fest
> > and running out of space.
>
> I suspect that with the new hook for obtaining pristines, the major user
> of library-add will be scripts: and they can trivially add the --sparse
> flag. The end user behaviour, for anyone useing library add, will be
> more varied.
One of my goals was to depreciate pristines in favour of sparse revisions
but, as you say, this can be decided in the corresponding hook script.
Pau
- [Gnu-arch-users] sparse libs and merge fest fun, Tom Lord, 2003/11/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sparse libs and merge fest fun, Pau Aliagas, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sparse libs and merge fest fun, Tom Lord, 2003/11/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] sparse libs and merge fest fun, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/13
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sparse libs and merge fest fun, Pau Aliagas, 2003/11/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sparse libs and merge fest fun, Miles Bader, 2003/11/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sparse libs and merge fest fun, Pau Aliagas, 2003/11/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sparse libs and merge fest fun, Miles Bader, 2003/11/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: sparse libs and merge fest fun, Pau Aliagas, 2003/11/14