[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License
From: |
Thomas Zander |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License |
Date: |
Thu, 20 Nov 2003 14:50:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
On Thursday 20 November 2003 13:44, Adam Sampson wrote:
> Samium Gromoff <address@hidden> writes:
> > www.opensource.org/licenses/osl.php
>
> This clause makes life very unpleasant for mirror sites:
>
> "If You distribute copies of the Original Work or a Derivative Work,
> You must make a reasonable effort under the circumstances to obtain
> the express and volitional assent of recipients to the terms of this
> License."
I'm not sure why you say that; it is impossible to mirror software based on
this licence since the above essentially says the software can only be
digitally distributed using something like a shring wrap licence. Users as
well as automatic downloads need to go through a licence agreement.
> Please don't use this license.
Well, everyone can, but in my (personal) book, this licence is not free.
--
Thomas Zander
- [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Samium Gromoff, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Anselm Lingnau, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Andrew Suffield, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Miles Bader, 2003/11/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/11/18
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License, Adam Sampson, 2003/11/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Savannah vs. Open Software License,
Thomas Zander <=