Re: [Gnu-arch-users] is there demand for itla?

[Andrea Arcangeli]

On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:45:27PM +0100, Jan Hudec wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 16:43:10 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 08:33:23AM -0800, Tom Lord wrote:
> > > 
> > > I've been thinking a lot since it came up about how to actually 
> > > build itla.
> > > 
> > > I believe it would be about 1-3 month's work to get a useful first
> > > release that is then fairly easy to extend.  I also think it would
> > > wind up eventually being a very handy tool for writing an arch GUI and
> > > for writing overarch-style functionality.
> > > 
> > > The question I'm stuck on is how much "demand" there is for itla.
> > > Opinions?  Ideas? Rants?  Tips?   I think it's a pretty exciting idea 
> > > but I'm not sure what priority to give it relative to other projects.
> > > 
> > > Enclosed is a fresh description of what itla would do initially, how
> > > it would work, and then how it could help with GUIs.
> > 
> > from my part I don't care about a GUI or itla or anything, until cvsps
> > equivalent exists and works efficiently.
> 
> tla logs does the basic functionality of cvsps. Itla is what should
> provide thre rest!

the thing I use most is:

        cvsps -r v2_4_21 -f fs/buffer.c -g

there are even't the tags with tla!