[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] itla vs. etla
From: |
Samium Gromoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] itla vs. etla |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:57:48 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.10.1 (Watching The Wheels) SEMI/1.14.5 (Awara-Onsen) FLIM/1.14.5 (Demachiyanagi) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Sat, 6 Dec 2003 14:56:57 +0000,
Andrew Suffield wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2003 at 03:58:56PM +0300, Samium Gromoff wrote:
> >
> > In the context of recent Three Letter Acronym research effort,
> > and in the memory of the excellent tool called wtf(1),
> > i propose to rename itla to etla!
> >
> > bash-2.05b$ /usr/games/wtf is tla
> > TLA: three letter acronym
> > bash-2.05b$ /usr/games/wtf is etla
> > ETLA: extended three letter acronym
>
> etla has existed for a while now. address@hidden/etla--main--0
woah. :-)
> --
> .''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
> : :' : http://www.debian.org/ |
> `. `' |
> `- -><- |