Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch lkml

[Mirian Crzig Lennox]

address@hidden (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>
> One thing [Arch] does not do is have the concept of a distributed
> repository, which may be a strength of bitkeeper.  You may be fine
> with just very good multiple repository handling, but I'm not
> certain.

I'm not sure I understand what distinction you are drawing between
BitKeeper's distributed repositories, and Arch's decentralised
archives.

In general, Arch treats branches and revisions on remote archives no
differently than those on one's "default" archive (given that
necessary permissions exist, of course).

cheers,
Mirian