[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file
From: |
Neil Stevens |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: SHA1 sums for checksums file |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jan 2004 18:24:03 -0800 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday January 06, 2004 6:18 pm, Tom Lord wrote:
> > From: Neil Stevens <address@hidden>
> >
> > On Tuesday January 06, 2004 4:25 pm, Colin Walters wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 15:55, Neil Stevens wrote:
> > > > As I jumped on tla 1.2pre0, moved all my sources to a new,
> > > > signed archive, I appreciate your making things compatibile
> > > > again.
> > >
> > > To be completely clear, the only incompatibility remaining is
> > > that tla 1.2pre0 will barf on the newer checksums file. But it
> > > was a test prerelease, so there should not be an expectation of
> > > strong compatibility constraints.
> >
> > That's not the line that was given throughout the 1.1pre series.
>
> Please relax.
I am. That's what my first mail was: thanks for keeping things compatible
in the way I need it. :-)
> 1.1 can read the 1.2preX archives, before or after Colin's patch, just
> fine.
>
> 1.2preX releases can read the 1.1 and earlier archives just fine.
>
> The incompatibility Colin is talking about is that if I merge his
> changes, then there will be some 1.2pre(X+1) which can generate
> revisions that 1.2pre0...1.2preX won't like.
I understand.
> I don't happen to think that that's a big deal but if you persuade me
> that it is, even that can limitation can be relaxed for some arbitrary
> period of time. Indefinately, even, if it's that big a deal.
I agree that it's not a big deal. All I care about is that future versions
will be able to read my tla 1.2pre0 archive.
thanks,
- --
Neil Stevens - address@hidden
"Any person or government that supports, protects, or harbors terrorists
is complicit in the murder of the innocent and will be held to account."
-- Vice President Richard B. Cheney
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQE/+23Df7mnligQOmERAgQuAKCUTMeVMfiLESYWzx0uzmoKOhXbBwCeLsXE
ieJae2sGvZyTEYYCwjZBVGU=
=WVtP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] SHA1 sums for checksums file, Andrew Suffield, 2004/01/06