Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Tutorial questions

[Robert Collins]

On Tue, 2004-02-03 at 08:18, C. R. Oldham wrote:

> I did so, and the output is missing the New-files: line indicating
> 
> {arch}/[...]/hello-world--mainline--0.1/[...]/patch-log/patch-2
> 
> was added to the archive.  The Modified-files: and the New-patches:
> lines are present however.  Was this just a feature change to remove the
> new files line since it is obvious that patch-2 would be in the archive
> since the New-patches line indicates it was applied?

Not sure offhand, I've dropped this in my TODO.

> Secondly, the next instruction in the the tutoral instructs me to check
> out from Candice's archive
> 
> tla get -A address@hidden \
>                     hello-world--candice--0.1--patch-2 \
>                     hw-C-0
> 
> When I do so I get
> 
> * from archive cached:
> address@hidden/hello-world--candice--0.1--base-0
> 
> ********************************
>  MISMATCHED ARCHIVE CHECKSUM
> 
>   archive: address@hidden
>   revision: hello-world--candice--0.1--base-0
>   file: hello-world--candice--0.1--base-0.tar.gz
> 
>   expected: 1385989ead1e8ea953cf88dc104f0047
>   got: 72dc72eb0e8243a568436ad254aba5c6
> 
> ********************************
> 
> I don't have the slightest clue what I might have done to cause that.  I
> have followed the tutorial instructions to the letter.  Suggestions?  Is
> there some way to ignore the checksum so I can see if the checked out
> source code is indeed corrupt?  It scares me because if it is not a bug
> then it makes me think it is easy to corrupt my archives...

rename the checksums file to something else. Short answer though:
Something has diddled the tarball and altered it behinds tla's back.

Rob
-- 
GPG key available at: <http://www.robertcollins.net/keys.txt>.

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part