gnu-arch-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Gnu-arch-users] ancestry and star-merge


From: Jean Helou
Subject: [Gnu-arch-users] ancestry and star-merge
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:48:53 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040209)

re all,

The ancestry explanation in the tutorial is pretty short, I would like to clear something up :

if I have the following (real world) situation:

test--jean--0.0.1         test--taff--0.0.1
-----------------         --------------------
base-0  ----------------->base-0

then I can say that test--jean--0.0.1--base-0 is an ancestor of test--taff--0.0.1--base-0 right ?

now I also have the following :

test--jean--0.0.1         test--michel--0.1
-----------------         --------------------
base-0  ----------------->base-0
                         patch-1

then test--jean--0.0.1--base-0 is also an ancestor of test--michel--0.1--base-0 therefore test--taff--0.0.1--base-0 and test--michel--0.1--base-0 _do_ have a common ancestor right ?
(maybe I have to few patches ... ? :) )

yet if i do
$tla get test--taff--0.0.1--base-0
$cd test--taff--0.0.1--base-0
$tla starmerge address@hidden/test--michel--0.1--base-0

I get :
star-merge: unable to merge unrelated trees.

$tla ancestry test--taff--0.0.1
gives
address@hidden
test--taff--0.0.1
 base-0 ... base-0
address@hidden
test--jean--0.0.1
 base-0

$tla ancestry test--michel--0.1
gives
address@hidden
test--michel--0.1
 patch-1 ... base-0
address@hidden
test--jean--0.0.1
 base-0



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]