[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates
From: |
Florian Weimer |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 23:39:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i |
Aaron Bentley wrote:
> > HTTP HEAD should provide the necessary information, once you have the
> > file name.
>
> Content-Length?
Yes.
> 1. Not the same as file size-- it's the size after encodings have been
> performed
If a transfer encoding is applied, no Content-Length: header must be
sent.
You don't want to perform any encoding for plain files anyway. It just
kills server performance.
> 2. Not required
Indeed.
> 3. It appears that for a HEAD request, the content-length is 0. Can
> anyone confirm or deny?
This looks like a server bug (it's a violation of a SHOULD in the RFC).
- [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/11
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Tom Lord, 2004/02/20
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Tom Lord, 2004/02/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/21
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Tom Lord, 2004/02/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Aaron Bentley, 2004/02/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Robert Collins, 2004/02/23
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] back-building pfs updates, Florian Weimer, 2004/02/21