[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits |
Date: |
Sat, 3 Apr 2004 12:43:45 -0800 (PST) |
> From: Robin Farine <address@hidden>
> > - star-merge is not a fundamental operation, in the sense that get,
> > update and commit are. It's not an archive operation, in the sense
> > that it does not produce or store revisions.
> I would say that only commit is a fundamental operation then, no?
Good luck defining "fundamental operation" with precision.
Core concepts are inventory, mkpatch/dopatch, patch logs, import,
commit, and tag. Roughly speaking, everything else can be explained
and understood in terms of those.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits, Tom Lord, 2004/04/02
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits, Robin Farine, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits, Tom Lord, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits, Tom Lord, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits, Robin Farine, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits,
Tom Lord <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits, Miles Bader, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Fast commits, Tom Lord, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] graphical merges, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] graphical merges, Matthieu Moy, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] graphical merges, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/03
- [Gnu-arch-users] A general way to get a specific revision, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] A general way to get a specific revision, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/03
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] graphical merges, Tom Lord, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] graphical merges, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/04
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] graphical merges, Tom Lord, 2004/04/04