[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!
From: |
David Snopek |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!! |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Apr 2004 10:03:27 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
SquirrelMail/1.5.0 |
David Snopek said:
> address@hidden:~/prj/xmldoom.cvs$ tla commit
> M src/engine/Xmldoom/Compiler/Config.py
> M src/engine/Xmldoom/Compiler/SQL.py
> M src/engine/Xmldoom/Compiler/__init__.py
> M src/engine/Xmldoom/Definition/Definition.py
> M src/engine/Xmldoom/Definition/Parser.py
> M tests/parser_test.py
> M tests/sqlscript_test.py
> M utils/rnc2rng/lex.py
> M utils/rnc2rng/yacc.py
> M src/schemas/xmldoom-definition.rnc
> arch_commit: unable to acquire revision lock (could not rename file.)
> tree: /home/xevol/prj/xmldoom.cvs
> revision:
> address@hidden/xmldoom--mainline--0.0--patch-5
Ok, I fixed this. I read through the source and ended up adding the
directory ++revision-lock/+contents to
xmldoom/xmldoom/xmldoom--mainline/xmldoom-mainline--0.0/patch-4
Why did I have to do this?
Thank you.
-- David Snopek
Satellite Computing Solutions, LLC
- [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, David Snopek, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, Michael Poole, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!,
David Snopek <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, Charles Duffy, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] More archive corruption!!, Tom Lord, 2004/04/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Tom Lord, 2004/04/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] newbie lockpicks, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/12
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Stefan Monnier, 2004/04/12
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: More archive corruption!!, Greek0, 2004/04/12