[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion |
Date: |
16 Apr 2004 12:53:28 +0900 |
Aaron Bentley <address@hidden> writes:
> Okay, so we agree that this would be breaking compatibility?
Well there are different sorts of compability; the most important would
be preserved -- old archives would still work. The decision of when to
break compatibility with old version of tla itself would then properly
be where it belongs, with the archive owner.
-Miles
--
Run away! Run away!
- [Gnu-arch-users] implicit discussion, Colin Walters, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] implicit discussion, Matthieu Moy, 2004/04/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/09
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Colin Walters, 2004/04/09
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/15
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion,
Miles Bader <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/15
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, mbp, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Aaron Bentley, 2004/04/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Robin Farine, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Johannes Berg, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Robert Collins, 2004/04/16