[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion |
Date: |
16 Apr 2004 11:55:52 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 |
> So the tree by itself uses about 226252kB, and adding explicit ids
> consumes another 68912kB, which is a remarkably large amount. On the
> other hand, it is only 0.1% of my very ordinary 70GB disk, so I don't
> think it matters very much.
If your disk space is mostly used for work on projects using Arch, then
that's not 0.1% but 30% of your disk space. Furthermore, it means that when
working on a project using such Arch id files, those little thingies eat up
30% of your disk bandwidth, and probably even more then that in latency.
I don't care much about disk space either, but disk access times are what
kills performance in the most effective way...
Stefan
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Robin Farine, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Johannes Berg, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Robert Collins, 2004/04/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Miles Bader, 2004/04/16
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Martin Pool, 2004/04/16
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion, Harald Meland, 2004/04/18
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: implicit discussion,
Stefan Monnier <=