Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Feature plans .... external references

[Bug Goo]

Created as bug 138

On Sat May 29 05:11:39 2004, Tom Lord wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>     > From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> 
>     > >> But doesn't the `fork' step require write access to the
>     > >> address@hidden archive?  This is more a question about `fork' I 
> guess,
>     > >> but mypoint is that it's important for `fork' to be able to make a 
> fork in
>     > >> some other archive, which also means that it can't so easily benefit 
> from
>     > >> the "downstream branch" feature (unless that feature is extended so 
> it can
>     > >> relate two branches in two different archives).
> 
>     > > No, `fork' in that case would create the new branch in the user's
>     > > default archive.
> 
>     > Hmm... so it's not going to be a "downstream branch" :-(
> 
> It should be, in some sense.
> 
>     cat--+X-$(mangle FQ-VSN)--x.y
> 
> should be reserved in the branch namespace for downstream branches of
> different archives.
> 
> -t
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnu-arch-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
> 
> GNU arch home page:
> http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
>