[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?
From: |
Richard Curnow |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken? |
Date: |
Fri, 25 Jun 2004 10:36:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
* Miles Bader <address@hidden> [2004-06-24]:
>
> Is it possible that libneon or whoever does that stuff isn't passing
> the appropriate "no-cache" option when retrieving the .listing file?
That seems to be so, at least in tla-1.2. I had a similar problem a few
weeks back which appeared to solve itself when a stale entry on the
caching proxy eventually expired (or something like that).
--
Richard \\\ SH-4/SH-5 Core & Debug Architect
Curnow \\\ SuperH (UK) Ltd, Bristol
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Charles Duffy, 2004/06/14
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tez Kamihira, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?,
Richard Curnow <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Tom Lord, 2004/06/24
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hackerlab broken?, Miles Bader, 2004/06/24