[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to")
From: |
Tom Lord |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to") |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:13:56 -0700 (PDT) |
> From: Charles Duffy <address@hidden>
> Think "configuration file syntax" instead of "language", then.
Think Greenspun's 10th which hasn't become such a popular saying for
no reason.
> Personally, though, I'd love to have something like bigloo's pattern
> language available for inventory rules -- it's vastly easier to
> programatically parse and modify than the regex syntaxes, not to mention
> more intuitive (for the user who doesn't know either to start with, at
> least).
> (For more on said pattern language, see section 6.2 of
>
http://www-sop.inria.fr/mimosa/fp/Bigloo/doc/bigloo-7.html#Pattern-Matching)
Heh. Nifty. Structured regexps are text, not s-expr oriented. They
are very similar to the language you cite but for text patterns.
-t
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Miles Bader, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Andrew Suffield, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Matthew Dempsky, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Aaron Bentley, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), James Blackwell, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Charles Duffy, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"),
Tom Lord <=
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Miles Bader, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 2004/06/30
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] arch roadmap 1 (and "what's tom up to"), Tom Lord, 2004/06/30