[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] [FEATURE-REQUEST] Caching mechanisme for patc
From: |
Matthieu MOY |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] [FEATURE-REQUEST] Caching mechanisme for patch-logs |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jul 2004 16:53:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.1 |
Quoting James Blackwell <address@hidden>:
> James Blackwell wrote:
> >> However, it looks like revisions, abrowse and rbrowse don't know how to
> >> use libraries.
>
> Matthieu Moy wrote:
> > also "tla missing".
>
> Sure. But what do you think about the idea?
Err, you didn't quote it, but I said it was good ;-) Still, I think it should be
a first step to a log-only library:
1) Tell tla places where it can get the log file for cheaper than in the archive
2) Tell tla a place where it can store it for next time.
(I rarely have all revisions of a version in my library, but I often call tla
revisions ...)
--
Matthieu
-------------------------------------------------
envoyé via Webmail/IMAG !
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] Caching mechanisme for patch-logs, (continued)
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] [FEATURE-REQUEST] Caching mechanisme for patch-logs, James Blackwell, 2004/07/05
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [BUG] [FEATURE-REQUEST] Caching mechanisme for patch-logs, Bug Goo, 2004/07/31