[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3)
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
[Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3) |
Date: |
Wed, 07 Jul 2004 13:07:32 +0900 |
address@hidden (James Blackwell) writes:
> I've tried "submission branches" and in my experience they're a pain in
> the rear. I personally suspect that you're pushing "submission branches"
> as a political tool to discourage diverging (and eventually forking)
> branches. What better way to control development, then to encourage
> submitters to keep their patches scattered around in different branches?
> That way, patches aren't concentrated into development trees that pose a
> potential threat to tla (a.k.a. "Tom Lord's Arch").
You've got to be kidding.
I agree with the "submission branches are annoying" part though.
-Miles
--
=====
(^o^;
(()))
*This is the cute octopus virus, please copy it into your sig so it can spread.
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), (continued)
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), Miles Bader, 2004/07/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), James Blackwell, 2004/07/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), Miles Bader, 2004/07/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), James Blackwell, 2004/07/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), Tom Lord, 2004/07/07
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), James Blackwell, 2004/07/07
- peace rocks Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), Tom Lord, 2004/07/07
- against paranoia Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), Tom Lord, 2004/07/07
- Re: against paranoia Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2004/07/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] what's all the fuss about merge requests?, Tom Lord, 2004/07/07
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3),
Miles Bader <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), James Blackwell, 2004/07/07
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Roadmap Draft (the anticipated part 3), mlh, 2004/07/06