[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?
From: |
John Meinel |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows? |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:58:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7 (Windows/20040616) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Well, one thing is that we aren't asking for a change in the archive
format. That is a hard sell because that is actively shared among
different people, and that breaks compatibility. What we are asking for
is a local change to a working directory. And if necessary, only on
win32. To me that's a much smaller request, which should make it more
palatable.
I'm wondering if we just switched to
c/b/v/p-nn and
c/v/p-nn
If there would be a lot of problem? If I have to give a special case
(such as =null), then we might as well make the special case be the
truly empty directory. IIRC, branches can't have a '.' in them, and
versions can't have anything but [0-9.] in them. And when I just tried
it wouldn't let me create cat--0--0, I'm guessing there is a restriction
on branches that forces them to have a letter.
So c/b/v/p-nn should be trivially separable from c/v/p-nn.
John
=:->
Stig Brautaset wrote:
| On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:08:01AM +0100, Adam Sampson wrote:
|
|>John Meinel <address@hidden> writes:
|>
|>
|>>So if all we do is switch from {arch}/c/c--b/c--b--v/c--b--v--p-nn.* to
|>>{arch}/c/--b/--v/--p-nn.* (I'm leaving in the -- because 'b' can be
|>>empty) we'll probably have a 75% solution.
|>
|>I think I'd prefer {arch}/c--/b--/v--/p-nn.* -- filenames starting
|>with "--" have the potential to irritate people even more than those
|>starting with "{".
|
|
| How about just c/b/v/p-nn with "=null" in place of branch if it is
| empty? It has been suggested before (not by me). I guess it means you
| have to use a special case though.
|
| Anyway, I don't see Tom agreeing to such a change anytime soon... :)
|
| Stig
|
|
| _______________________________________________
| Gnu-arch-users mailing list
| address@hidden
| http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnu-arch-users
|
| GNU arch home page:
| http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/gnu-arch/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Cygwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA9XRiJdeBCYSNAAMRAqhSAKCUP5aHSVFu/DZWR6nf2Y/ZWqa3FgCfcULa
aU3L1ozU0m8dGht1G8N8x+U=
=nImg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, Lionel Elie Mamane, 2004/07/17
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, Eske Christiansen, 2004/07/13
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, Adam Sampson, 2004/07/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, John Meinel, 2004/07/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, Harald Meland, 2004/07/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, Stig Brautaset, 2004/07/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?,
John Meinel <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, Ron Parker, 2004/07/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, Aaron Bentley, 2004/07/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, Ron Parker, 2004/07/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, Aaron Bentley, 2004/07/14
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on windows?, John Meinel, 2004/07/14