[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees
From: |
James Blackwell |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees |
Date: |
Fri, 23 Jul 2004 10:08:39 -0400 |
Jblack wrote:
>> It should work. Aaron and I have been star-merging each other with
>> reference for a couple days now.
>>
>
Jani wrote:
> Tried again and still no luck.Looked at star-merge did these modifications and
> it seems to work...
> Is this a bug and it worked so far only for branches tagged from the same
> patch-level? It seems that x (the numer of pathes in Tom's branch in this
> case 28) was not indexing anything and only base-0 was looked at?
> I am not entirely sure why this change made a difference but I hope someone
> will explain..
I tried taking a look at it at your mirror at
http://mirrors.sourcecontrol.net/address@hidden, but it looks like
you don't have any tla at all??
--
James Blackwell Try something fun: For the next 24 hours, give
Smile more! each person you meet a compliment!
GnuPG (ID 06357400) AAE4 8C76 58DA 5902 761D 247A 8A55 DA73 0635 7400
- [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, Jani Monoses, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, James Blackwell, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, Jani Monoses, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees,
James Blackwell <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, Jani Monoses, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, James Blackwell, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, Jani Monoses, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, James Blackwell, 2004/07/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] star-merge and unrelated trees, Jani Monoses, 2004/07/26